An Analysis of Homonymy in Movie Script of Stand By Me by Fujiko (Semantics Study)

Fristi Arfiawati; Salma Rizkiyanti Alamsyah

doi:10.56413/studi ilmiah sastra.v12i1.300

Fristi Arfiawati Universitas Nasional Pasim
Salma Rizkiyanti Alamsyah Universitas Nasional Pasim

DOI: https://doi.org/10.56413/studi%20ilmiah%20sastra.v12i1.300

Keywords: Homonymy, Semantic, Category, Spelling.

Abstract

This research entitled An Analysis of Homonymy in Movie Script of Stand By Me by Fujiko investigated the homonymy and the most dominant usage of homonymy by using the theory of Saeed (2009) and Apresjan J. D (1974). Furthermore, This research utilized a descriptive method and the data were obtained from movie script of Stand By Me by Fujiko. The result showed that there are eight datas of homonymy that comprises into 2 datas of same spelling-category, 0 data of same category–different spelling, 2 datas of different category-same spelling and 4 datas of different category-different spelling. Thus, It can be conclude that the most dominant usage of homonymy types is different category-different spelling with the percentage of 50%.

References

Adriaens G, Small SL, Cottrell GW, Tanenhaus MK. Lexical ambiguity resolution: perspectives from psycholinguistics, neuropsychology, and artificial intelligence. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers; 1988. Apresjan, J. D. 1973. Regular Polysemy in: Linguistics. Retrieved from:https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/12b2/601091e1c8c3442ee4269b893 d730956d 7b2.pdf (January 2010) Berreta A and Poeppel D.2005. The effects of homonymy and polysemy on lexical access: an MEG study Kroeger. R, Paul. 2018. Analyzing meaning: An introduction to semantics and pragmatics. Berlin: Language Science Press.
Klein, DE.,& Murphy, G.L. Paper has been my ruin: Conceptual relations of polysemoussense Journal of Memory and Language. Retrieved from: http://www.psych.nyu.edu/murphy/Klein-Murphy_02.pdf (July 2002) Lyon, John. 1985. An Introduction to Theoritical Linguistics.London: Cambridge University Press. Lyon, John. 1997. Semantics I. London: Cambridge University Press. O’Grady and Archibald, J. 1996. Contemporary Linguistic analysis: An Introduction. Canada:Pearson.
Palmer, F.R. 1981. Semantics A New Outline. London: Cambridge University Press Parera, J. D. 1990. Teori Semantik. Jakarta: Erlangga. Restu, Resmiyati. 2020. The Distinction Between Polysemy And Homonymy On Lexical Ambiguity
Saeed, John I. 2009. Semantics (Third Edition). United Kingdom. MPG Books Ltd
Saeed, John I. 2016. Semantics. United Kingdom. MPG Books Ltd Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: ALFABET. Sutopo. (2002). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif: Dasar Teori dan Terapannya dalam Penelitian. Surakarta: UNS Press. Valera S, Ruz A E. 2020.Conversion in English: homonymy, polysemy and paronymy. Vanhove, Martine (ed.) 2008: From Polysemy to Semantic Change: Towards a Typology of Lexical Semantic Associations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Yule, George. 2014. The Study of Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.