THE USE OF DEIXIS IN BASIC WRITING COURSE OF THE FIRST SEMESTER STUDENTS OF ENGLISH STUDY PROGRAM IN PASIM NATIONAL UNIVERSITY: PRAGMATICS STUDY

Fristi Arfiawati

doi:10.56413/studi ilmiah sastra.v15i2.561

Fristi Arfiawati Universitas Nasional PASIM

DOI: https://doi.org/10.56413/studi%20ilmiah%20sastra.v15i2.561

Keywords: Deixis, Person, Time, Place, Discourse, Social

Abstract

The research entitled The Use of Deixis in Basic Writing Course of the First Semester Students of English Study Program in Pasim National University is purposed to investigate the types of deixis as one of pragmatics study. The research used the theory from Yule (1996) and Levinson (1983). The research method applied is the descriptive qualitative. The source of data was derived from the students’ work of Basic Writing class in the first semester. In addition, the data were collected, classified and analyzed by the writer. The writer found 313 data of deixis. The result shows that 313 data of deixis are divided into 133 data of person deixis, 80 data of time deixis, 75 data of place deixis, 7 data of discourse deixis, and 18 data of social deixis. Thus, the most dominant deixis is person deixis with 42.5%.

References

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C., & Razavieh, A. (2010). Introduction to research in education (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Bazzanella, C. (2019). The Complex Process of Mis/Understanding Spatial Deixis in Face-to-Face Interaction. De Gruyter.

Bloch, B., & Trager, G. L. (1942). Outline of linguistic analysis. Baltimore: Linguistic Society of America.

Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th ed.). White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.

Creswell (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.

Crystal, D. (2008). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics (6th ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Dylgjeri, A., & Kazazi, L. (2013). Deixis in modern linguistics and outside. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(4), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.5901/ajis.2012.v2n4p87

Ekowati & Sofwan (2014). The Use of Pragmatics Deixis in Conversation Texts in Pathway to English. FBS. Universitas Negeri Semarang Indonesia

Fillmore, C. J. (1997). Lectures on deixis. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.

Fromkin, V., Rodman, R., & Hyams, N. (2011). An introduction to language (9th ed.). Boston: Wadsworth.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1989). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Harmer, J. (2004). How to teach writing. Harlow: Longman.

Hasanah,et al (2024). Navigating Deixis in Political Discourse: An Examination of Zelensky and Putin’s Speeches. DEIKTIS

Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nunan, D. (2003). Practical English language teaching. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Saeed, J. I. (2009). Semantics (3rd ed.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Yule, G. (2010). The Study of Language (4th ed). Cambridge University Press.